Colder winters due to climate change What a load of craplink

                      
 

16 Nov 10 - "Climate change could lead to colder winters in northern regions, according to a study by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, says this article from Reuters. "(The) finding does not conflict with global warming,"

Anomalies in atmospheric airstreams "could triple the probability of cold winter extremes in Europe and northern Asia," says Vladimir Petoukhov, lead author of the study. "Recent severe winters like last year's or the one of 2005/06 do not conflict with the global warming picture but rather supplement it."

"Almost 200 nations meet in Mexico from Nov. 29 to Dec. 10 to try to agree a "green fund" to help poor countries deal with climate change and other steps towards an elusive treaty to tackle global warming."

Let's see if I can put this scientifically: What a load of crap.  It never ceases to amaze me how far logic can be twisted for political purposes.

See entire article:
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/LDE6AF1I1.htm
Thanks to Steven Woodcock, Benjamin Napier and Raul for this link

New Food Crisis Loomslink

---

Author:	Toni Johnson

Flood victims wait in line for food handouts at a relief camp in Pakistan’s Sindh province. (Athar Hussain/Courtesy Reuters)

The world experienced a major food crisis in 2008 that led to civil and political unrest from Bangladesh to Haiti and added millions more to those suffering from malnutrition. Though prices have dropped somewhat, some analysts say the crisis never totally ended. With prices rising dramatically in 2010, the world could be on the brink of a new crisis.
While food prices remain below their 2008 highs, “they’re a lot higher than they were before ‘the food crisis of 2008′ took hold,” says financial journalist Addison Wiggin (Forbes), noting that wheat, corn, and sugar prices are up more than 50 percent since the beginning of the year. Farm commodity expert Don Coxe argues the first major crop failure in 2011 is all that’s needed to “have a full-blown food crisis,” one potentially worse than 2008.
In a November report last week, the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) sounded the alarm over skyrocketing food prices, predicting the world’s food import bill (PDF) could be more than $1 trillion in 2010. The FAO says that food stocks are high enough to avert a new crisis but that predictions that cereal yields in chief producing countries will decrease in the coming year are driving prices up much faster than they rose in 2008.
The report notes countries such as Pakistan, devastated by flooding this summer, and many least-developed countries are expected to feel rising food prices the most; it argues more should be done to understand the implications of commodity market speculation on food prices. “A key lesson of 2008 is that volatile global financial markets can result in food commodity price speculation that has dire consequences for the world’s poorest,” notes CFR’s Laurie Garrett. But others say that it was export restrictions, panic buying, and hoarding (JakartaPost) that precipitated the 2008 crisis.
Some countries are already beginning to respond. Russia announced in October it would continue its ban on grain exports for another eight months, a measure put in place in August following the severe drought and wildfires that decimated crops in the country this summer. China, experiencing the worst food inflation since 2008 (SydneyMorningHerald), announced last week it would cap prices on grains, edible oil, and sugar. And the EU is contributing 40 million euros to stabilize Pakistan’s food prices.
As global food demand increases, experts say more should be done to bolster agriculture production in least- developed countries and reduce agriculture trade barriers. “Looking beyond the immediate crisis, the United States and other developed countries must renew long-neglected investments in agriculture assistance across the developing world, targeting small farmers as the fundamental drivers of economic growth,” wrote John Podesta and Jake Caldwell (FP) of the progressive think tank Center for American Progress in August. In particular, they argue that the United States, responsible for half of global food aid, should loosen restrictions on allowing aid dollars to be used for locally grown food.
Analysis
Concerns about global wheat supplies are sparking fears that price inflation in the wheat market could lead to a food crisis akin to the one in 2008, says CFR’s Laurie Garrett.
A report by the U.S.-based International Food Policy Research Institutes argues to avert another food crisis several steps are necessary, including making agricultural trade freer; addressing long-term threats to productivity; and encouraging agricultural production in countries heavily dependent on food imports.
In Foreign Affairs, Roger Thurow says that with one billion people already going hungry and the world’s population rising, global food production must urgently be increased, and Africa, with help, has the best opportunity to increase production.
This 2008 CFR working paper examines causes and policy implications of food price inflation.

World War III and North Korealink

---

Paul A Drockton M.A.

In analyzing this latest confrontation between North and South Korea, it is easy to come up with a variety of possibile scenarios:

Scenario #1

The United States has 28,000 American Troops guarding the border between North and South Korea. The border is only 160 miles long. That means 175 American Troops guarding 1 mile of South Korean Border. Not that anyone from the South, which enjoys a much higher standard of living, would care to illegally immigrate to the North. Those working in the North Korean slave camps, for companies like Brittish American tobacco, would have to first get through the North Korean army that is also amassed at the border.

The United States spends an estimated 54% of its Federal Budget on its military (including past debt for military purposes). (Source) South Korea, on the other hand, only spends 2.7% of its GDP on military expenditures.(Source). The people of the United States are spending their taxdollars on a country that can well afford to pay its own way. One solution would be South Korea to reimburse the US for all of its military expenses.

A better solution would be to pull out of South Korea altogether and reassign those troops to the Mexican border, which just received a whopping 1200  National Guardsmen for almost 2,000 miles of border. While Americans have their “packages” checked by the TSA, illegal immigrants come and go freely through our Sothern border without  ever seeing a TSA agent.

Then there is the South Korean Lobbyist, Sun Myung Moon, who was crowned Messiah in front of adoring fans like Senator Orrin Hatch from Utah. Senator Hatch, and others like him, are more than willing to support the interests of foreign nations like North Korea, while ignoring the interests of those that put them in office.

Which brings us back to the Illuminati Banksters looking to destroy the middle class and dilute the wages of American workers. They are also the owners of the international corporations that have partnered with countries like North Korea, Mexico and China, to produce foreign goods for the United States in what can be only called slave-labor conditions.

All of this leads to one conclusion. A False flag between North and South Korea reminds us of how important it is for us to continue to waste our resources on a country that has the same strategic importance as South Vietnam.

Scenario 2:

This is the start of World War III. China, which launched a missile off the coast of California, is using North Korea to raise tensions and draw the United States military resources away from the Middle East. This would include dividing up the US naval forces between Asia and the Persian Gulf, where they could more easily be destroyed by a combination of Russian and Chinese weaponry.

This makes more sense when you factor in the Chinese Air Force, which would have a much easier time striking off the Coast of Korea then in the Persian Gulf. Also, the Chinese Army could fight close to home, on familiar turf, with a much shorter supply route. Strategically, it makes sense. This would enable the Chinese to use their advantage, the massive Red Army, without the expense and time of troop transportation.

A Nuclear False Flag on American soil would force the United States into a multi-front nuclear war. I believe that Russia and China will launch a first strike on military and civilian targets to minimize our ability to respond. This is further complicated by the fact that Western technology has been given to both countries by the treacherous banksters and their Illuminati brethren.

This will be their next great Satanic Sacrifice.

Will God permit it? Read the Book of Revelation and decide for yourself.